so basically i have gotten this discussion post for paper 1 which you did and i nee 5 sentencesIn advance of the midterm paper due this weekâand now that youve learned some consumer psychology and flexed your emerging scientific reasoningâI would like you to revisit your own (and others!) discussion posts from Week 1.Would you change anything about your original study proposal? Why or why not? And if you WOULD change it, how?More to the point, is this the idea you want to write about in your midterm paper due this week?Of course, you may propose whatever study you like in your paper, though hopefully you realize that the discussion posts are designed to help you do some of this work in a gradual manner over the course, rather than all at once when an assignment is due.As always, reach out to me by email if you want to discuss anything, especially going into your first paper in this course.done2 mins agoi p
osted this in discussion/week 1 so can you help me in thisIn the USA, we have many companies making electronic products. A product or brand which I think they could be made better is the Lenovo Think pad laptops. First of all, the processing speed of the Lenovo Think pad laptops is prolonged.The physical appearance and how the laptops appear physically isnât client-attracting, and I think the company should consider reviewing that. I want to propose that the firm attempt to manufacture laptops with a better speed, which entails the manufacture of processing chips faster. For example, on the physical appearance aspect, when you take a swipe at Lenovoâs competitors, Samsung, Apple Mac Books, the brands tend to attract people due to how they are manufactured to be attractive. Lenovo should try using a smooth outside body of the attractive laptops, and the current one is ugly.the other 2 discussion are in document