scholarly sources (including your source from Week 3). Include the following: The annotation section should

Read/review the following resources for this activity: Create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources (including your source from Week 3). Include the following: The annotation section should include the following: Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. , (1), 58-63. In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gage learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot ful

💡 Buy the answer for only $12 Get it now →

ly engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school. This activity will be graded based on Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric. WO2.1-2.3, 2.6 Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 100 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation 50.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting 10.0 pts Total Points: 100.0 Purchase the answer to view it

💡 Buy the answer for only $12 Get it now →