Make sure to iinclude detailed speaker notes and follow the grading rubric closely, as I will be grading according to the grading rubric. Tip: ALWAYS include detailed speaker notes when developing a PowerPoint. This is VERY important. 32 (32%) 35 (35%)The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.28 (28%) 31 (31%)The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.25 (25%) 27 (27%)The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.0 (0%) 24 (24%)The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker, or is missing. 14 (14%) 15 (15%)The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.12 (12%) 13 (13%)The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.11 (11%) 11 (11%)The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.0 (0%) 10 (10%)The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing. 32 (32%) 35 (35%)The presentation clearly and thorou
ghly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.28 (28%) 31 (31%)The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.25 (25%) 27 (27%)The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.0 (0%) 24 (24%)The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. 5 (5%) 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.4 (4%) 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.0 (0%) 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. 5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.