Test 1 Part 2 Questions For the following questions, I expect 3 paragraphs for each response. Your answers should reflect awareness of the assigned reading, the instructors lectures, the weekly discussions and your own ideas. Remember, I expect to see original thought. I want you to use the sources listed above and your own ideas (I dont want you to search for other sources). 1) How can a person be happy? Explain what Aristotle thinks happiness consists in, and how one can be happy. Differentiate primary and secondary goods. Do you think Aristotle is correct about primary goods? Why? In the Plato implies something troubling about happiness. What is this implication? Is it inconsistent with Aristotles thoughts on happiness? Explain. 2) In John Stuart Mills , an argument is made in favor of freedom of expression. Explain Mills reasons for encouraging freedom of expression, and also explain the objections to freedom of expression implied by Platos . Do you think we should be allowed to express ourselves as we wish? What might go wrong? 3) Imagine you are able to save many people by causing harm to one person, as in the Trolley Problem. Is it morally better to save many or to remain uninvolved? Make an argument defending a course of action and explain why your recommended course of action is morally best. How one decide what the best course of action is? 4) Differentiate how a consequentialist and a deontologist might think about the morality of lying. Is it wrong to lie, or might it be acceptable? Why? Which of these perspectives do you most agree with? Format: APA Number of pages: 1 Double spaced Type of work: Writing from scratch Type of work: Case study Sources needed: 3 Subject: Nursing Academic Level: Bachelor Details Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide citations/references for your answers in APA format. Sexual assault includes any type of sexual activity to which an individual does not agree. Because of the effects of some drugs, commonly called date rape drugs, victims may be physically helpless, unable to refuse, or even unable to remember what happened for . Jessica, a 16-year-old high school sophomore, expresses concern to the school nurse practitioner that she knows someone who might have had sex without knowing it. How can the nurse practitioner answer these common questions? Reflective Questions What are date rape drugs and how can a person be unaware that such a drug has been ingested? What can you do to protect yourself? What do you do if you think you have been sexually assaulted? What can you do when someone you care about has been sexually assaulted? What role does a nurse practitioner play in the care of sexually assaulted patients, particularly in the adolescent age group? Your first work is a rhetorical analysis worth 15%. The purpose of such work is to analyze an work or speech by breaking it in various parts and discussing how rhetorical tools are used for effective communication. You can choose to examine the three cornerstones of a rhetorical exercise: ethos, logos and pathos. You may also opt to look at additional rhetorical devices such as allusions, analogies, figures of speech (i.e. metaphors and similes etc) if you believe the author makes effective use of them in his/her work. The work should be 2 ½ to 3 pages. You will not take sides on the issue that the speaker is writing on; you will not summarize it or consult other sources. You will only analyze it. Be sure to use MLA guidelines in formatting your work and observing in-text citation. There is no need for a works cited page. A draft and peer review are due on Thursday, Sept 16 (you will do the pe
er review with a group member as assignment (or class work if class time permits) and the final is due Monday, Sept. 20th. These is the list of work/speeches for the assignment. Choose one. 1. Speech Delivered at the Cotton States and International Exposition by Booker T. Washington p. 47 2. Truth: Remarks on the Removal of Confederate Monuments in New Orleans by Mitch Landrieu p. 434 3. The First White President by Ta-Nehisi Coates p. 341 4. The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action by Audre Lorde p. 188 5. p Hops Lil Sisters Speak by Bettina Love p. 288 6. School Segregation: The Continuing Tragedy of Ferguson by Nikole Hannah-Jones p. 381 Video Link: ___________________________________________ Below is information to guide you to write the introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion of the rhetorical analysis from . There is a link below that takes you directly to the same information on the web. How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis. , which is the purpose of the piece, the appeals, evidence and techniques used. Next, break down the examples of appeals, evidence and techniques and finally offer an explanation of why they worked or did not in your opinion. Find below the link and a clear example of the structure of the rhetorical analysis. Martin Luther King, Jr.s I Have a Dream speech is widely regarded as one of the most important pieces of oratory in American history. Delivered in 1963 to thousands of civil rights activists outside the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., the speech has come to symbolize the spirit of the civil rights movement and even to function as a major part of the American national myth for this . This rhetorical analysis argues that Kings assumption of the prophetic voice, amplified by the historic size of his audience, creates a powerful sense of ethos that has retained its inspirational power over the years. The of your rhetorical analysis is where youll tackle the text directly. Its often divided into three paragraphs, although it may be more in a longer work. Each should focus on a different element of the text, and they should all contribute to your overall argument for your thesis statement. . Hover over the example to explore how a typical body paragraph is constructed. Kings speech is infused with prophetic language throughout. Even before the famous dream part of the speech, Kings language consistently strikes a prophetic tone. He refers to the Lincoln Memorial as a hallowed spot and speaks of rising from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to make justice a reality for all of Gods children. The assumption of this prophetic voice constitutes the texts strongest ethical appeal; after linking himself with political figures like Lincoln and the Founding Fathers, Kings ethos adopts a distinctly religious tone, recalling Biblical prophets and preachers of change from across history. This adds significant force to his words; standing before an audience of hundreds of thousands, he states not just what the future should be, but what it will be: The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges. This warning is almost apocalyptic in tone, though it concludes with the positive image of the bright day of justice. The power of Kings rhetoric thus stems not only from the pathos of his vision of a brighter future, but from the ethos of the prophetic voice he adopts in expressing this vision. The conclusion of a rhetorical analysis wraps up the work by restating the main argument and showing how it has been developed by your analysis as at . It may also try to link the text, and your analysis of it, with broader concerns.