This case addresses the fine line an employer must tread between protecting an employee’s (or former employee’s) privacy versus the obligation that an employer has to warn potential new employers that a particular individual poses a potential threat based on past behavior (e.g., violence, threats, mental instability).Three Roles: human resource supervisor (Gary Garcia), branch manager n (Anthony Garrison), branch supervisor (Maya Atkins).Scenario:Neil Andrews is a hardworking employee but has a reputation for being a hothead. After branch manager Anthony Garrison changed Andrews’ work schedule so that he would now have to work every other Saturday, Andrews gets extremely upset. He walks into Garrison’s office, puts his face inches away from Garrison’s face and says, “One of these days, I’m going to lose it in here. After I am done, there will be nothing but smoke and embers!” He storms out of the office and goes across the street to a convenience store. About 15 minutes later, Andrews returns, calmer after having eaten two packages of Toasted Sweeties and washing it down with a soda. He picks up his toolbox and goes to his next assignment for the day. Garrison has never liked Andrews and sees this episode as an opportunity to get rid of him. Activity: This is a two-part scenario. Part 1 – You are to decide if Andrews should be discharged. Once you make your decision, state what your decision is and justify your decision Part 2 – Assume for the sake of this portion of the activity that Andrews is discharged. What type of information (if any) should Personally Yours give when a potential employer calls for a reference?RubricHRM4481 Grading RubricHRM4481 Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing and Proofreading3.75 ptsWritten responses are free of grammatical spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.3 ptsWritten responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.2.25 ptsWritten responses contain a few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation, etc. Some errors but not so many to indicate repetitive distractions.1.5 ptsWritten responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The errors distract the reader.0.75 ptsUses incorrect grammar and incorrect sentence str
ucture consistently. The errors interfere with the communication process.3.75 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of material4.5 ptsThe writer understands significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by correct use of terminology, precise selection of information components required to make a point. Correct use of examples .3.6 ptsAble to distinguish and comprehends a deeper meaning on most occasions. Ideas are reasonably clear. Some subjective evaluation is necessary to determine what the writer means.2.7 ptsComprehends the surface level meaning of the material and begins to relate issues to general knowledge and experience1.8 ptsDemonstrates some basic comprehension of the material . Does not make connections with the bigger picture.0.9 ptsNot comprehending or reflecting on what is read or viewed4.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength, content and ability to interpret and answer assignment2.25 ptsWork demonstrates that all tasks were completed Showed some originality and extra initiative in completing assignment.1.8 ptsWork demonstrates that significant effort was made to attempt all aspects of the assignment. Ideas connected clearly.1.35 ptsWork demonstrates that some effort was made to attempt all tasks that were assigned. Occasional sense of engagement of writer with the subject matter.0.9 ptsLittle effort was made to attempt all tasks that were assigned. Ideas were connected but weak0.45 ptsVery little effort was given to the task assignment. No response was given.2.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of answers, opinions and ideas.4.5 ptsStudent is clearly expressing arguments, opinions and responses in answering assignments. Superior ideas and insights. Answers are clear and complex.3.6 ptsStudent is more consistent in expressing arguments, opinions and responses when answering assignments2.7 ptsStudent is learning to develop and express arguments, opinions and responses in answering assignments. More complex and insightful answers.1.8 ptsNot developing their ability to express arguments, ideas or opinions. Ideas are not complex or insightful. May include some information that distracts from central purpose.0.9 ptsStudent is not able to express opinions, ideas, and responses due to inadequate writing skills. Ideas are unclear.4.5 ptsTotal Points: 15PreviousNext